Who was faster Jackie Joyner Kersee or Florence Griffith Joyner?
anonymous
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Who was faster Jackie Joyner Kersee or Florence Griffith Joyner?
Six answers:
smitty
2006-10-17 15:31:16 UTC
To tall guy - It was never proved that they did steroids, you fish-eyed fool.
You can not compare the two ladies. Flo-Jo was a sprinter. Jackie did the heptathlon.
moglie
2006-10-17 10:31:28 UTC
Flo Jo was faster 10:49 in the 100m. Jackie was a Hep athlete who when doing individual events did the 100m hurdles and long jump. Flo only did the 100m and 200m
Jim G
2006-10-18 08:48:24 UTC
FloJo was a sprinter whereas Jackie did the heptathlon and was not as fast but was versatile and strong.
geom1974
2006-10-17 10:18:17 UTC
FGJ was definetly faster- I don't beleive they ever competed head to head but in terms of overall times during races I think Joyner consistently had the better times
Anonymous
2006-10-17 10:16:38 UTC
Depends who and when they are using steroids (!)
NLS
2006-10-17 13:49:07 UTC
Flo Jo's 100m & 200m PRs are the current WRs of 10.49 (this mark is suspected to be highly wind-assisted, but the wind-gauge malfunctioned and showd up as 0.0 - her next best 'legal' wind time was 10.61] & 21.34
I cannot recall JJK's 100m PR, but her 200m PR was 22.30 which would leave her far behind Flo-Jo's best 200m efforts
In a nutshell: Flo-Jo was much faster than JJK. JJK was a greater all-rounder than Flo-Jo
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.