Question:
What are the sports that shouldn't be in the olympics in your opinion?
Bashy
2013-05-11 10:51:36 UTC
I think basketball, tennis, football(soccer), sailing, handball, synchronized swimming... The worst sports out of my list would have to include equestrian and BMX cycling. The sad thing is that IOC is trying to replace the traditional olympic sports, like wrestling, with that pile of ****.
Twelve answers:
?
2013-05-11 11:42:55 UTC
yep



but the olympics has lost its actual purpose, it's about money and by bringing these sports to the olympics, fans will be attracted.



wrestling is no longer part of it and golf is which said it all.



i think replacing traditional olympics sports literally sums up the world we live in, money will always be first over passion and tradition. it's like we live in a business planet now where we are more happy and thankful that we have money than life.
Interested Observer
2016-07-29 07:17:57 UTC
Start by eliminating all pure team sports. These emulate national rivalry and war. The Olympics is about individuals apart from their nationality, nor faux war, even if everyone is nice about it, most of the time. No soccer, basketball, baseball, water polo etc. I feel sorry for field hockey that really needs the stage. Team scoring and medals in individual events such as gymnastics are dubious. This will take a big load off costs as well. Relays are no problem.



Then put back wrestling, one of the few obviously Olympic of Olympic sports.



Minimize sports based on judging not objective or measurable results. Goodbye synchronized swimming, rhythmic gymnastics. We reluctantly retain figure skating and gymnastics despite that defect.



Get rid of junk sports. Goodbye beach volleyball (Karch Kiraly's retirement plan), x-games freak show events (para-sailing in place of real boat racing), ski events based on judging. Goodbye short track speed skating, the Olympic roller-derby on ice.



Back to basics and as little faux war as possible.
Easton Nguyen
2013-05-13 12:03:04 UTC
Equestrian and shooting shouldn't be parts of the Olympic!

I love Synchronized swimming (it's more physical demanding more than it seem)

Gymnastics is the traditional sport of the Olympic, it definitely need to be kept!!!! Love Gymnastics.

I love figure skating!!! It's very difficult and entertaining.

Any sports that don't require a lot of physical activities shouldn't be part of the Olympics!!!
Hello
2013-05-12 16:52:35 UTC
Sailing should stay in the olympics. It is a challenging sport which requires knowledge of strategies and tactics while also requiring the athlete to be in good shape (Extra weight in the boat slows you down and if you are too light, you need to pack on muscle.) I'm going to nationals for my type of boat and believe me, the competition is fierce. Equestrian, on the other hand, is a sport of the upper class which requires little of these skills. Drop equestrian.
lestermount
2013-05-13 05:48:31 UTC
I agree that many Olympic sports look like Mountain Dew commercials not sports.

Dancing with a ribbon on a stick is not a sport, synchronized swimming in singles is ridiculous, as is BMX biking and some other things.

Unfortunately the voters determine what is and what is not a sport.
?
2013-05-11 17:01:52 UTC
Synchronized swimming shouldn't be dropped:

--It's much more physically rigorous than many other athletes realize. It's meant to look easy - but those who do it at that level are literally dying the entire time! Touching the walls and bottom of the pool are prohibited - so all of the flips and stuff - that's done by purely treading water. Much of the routines are spent under water, moving one's arms at a fast pace - it's like running sprints - which everyone agrees is a sport - except one can't breathe for thirty second intervals during the sprint. If you don't think it's hard - try it - or at least try some of the stuff they have to do. Get in a pool and tread with your arms above your head - you won't be able to do it for minutes without dropping your height below your shoulders. Or try holding your legs out of water while upside down holding your breath - hard to maintain!

--Synchronized swimmers train for more time that athletes in any other sport. That's because of the full body strength required to do it. Unlike sports like running, which focus dominantly on the legs - synchronized swimmers need leg strength (to be able to tread water so powerfully), arm strength (to be able to paddle hard enough to support legs in vertical position), core strength (for certain positions such as ballet legs, balencing on lifts, or maintaining an aligned vertical position in the water), lung strength (you try spending that much time under water moving around without breathing!) cardiovascular strength (to keep them from collapsing from all of that exertion.), and more.

--Many don't find it exciting because no one is trying to kill eachother like wrestlers. But, much of synchronized swimming routines is risk moves - moves that either work fantastically or they're an epic fail - and they are so fast that it is very hard to control the movement, or stop it if it isn't going well. The lifts are an example of this. It is really hard to stand on people who aren't in one fixed position, and if you fall, it hurts (a LOT), you may hurt a teammate, and if nothing else your execution score just dropped enough to give you last place.

--Just because it is a "subjective" sport doesn't mean that all the ranks are based on is "I liked that" or "I didn't like that." There is a very specific set of rules, a list of criteria for scoring and descriptions of every piece of the spectrum, a set amount of weighting that is granted to certain types of scores (Difficulty is worth 20% of one's score while (surprise) synchronization is only worth 5%). It is actually pretty complicated.



Anyone who ever tried the sport can attest to this - it's one of the most time consuming and physically rigorous sports in existance. People don't just wake up one day and do it well. People give up the rest of their lives to do this sport competatively. Those people don't deserve to have their dreams crushed because some people think an activity that for olympians involves practice weeks greater than fifty hours is a sport.
Prof
2013-05-11 12:21:06 UTC
I was a Games Maker in 2012.Coca-Cola and McDonalds were the major sponsors...says it all...American culture ?However,if it does not sell tickets/not popular on TV/not played around the world (like wrestling,it is "out").Sports and interest of particular sports changes over the years....the most popular sport in the uk is football,followed by cricket,rugby etc.,(based on TV interest).However,not many years ago snooker was incredibly popular...REALLY popular,yet will not be in the Olympics ! Is it a sport ?
?
2016-03-11 00:49:33 UTC
Yes
?
2013-05-11 19:02:01 UTC
Synchronized swimming should be dropped. Equestrian should be dropped. Gymnastics should be dropped. And figure skating dropped. Basically anything you can be judged on. Also if cheerleading, golf, or ballet ever make it I'm moving to mars.
vballa19
2013-05-13 00:52:19 UTC
I like me some equestrian.. None of that pansy @ss wrestling.
ursaitaliano70
2013-05-13 10:29:50 UTC
Sailing

shooting

archery

table tennis

tennis

golf

curling
anonymous
2013-05-11 11:22:57 UTC
Wait until you see golf at Rio.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...